All guides

Manual lookups vs. Eazelo

You can always check a provider by hand. Here's exactly what changes when Eazelo does the legwork.

1The manual route (what you do today)

Verifying one provider by hand usually means three separate stops: the NPPES registry for identity and taxonomy, the right state board site for license status (finding the right board is its own research when the provider isn't a physician), and CMS data if you care about practice locations or affiliations. Then you screenshot or copy what you found, and the evidence lives in your downloads folder — undated, unsigned, and hard for anyone else to trust later.

2The same checks, one flow

A Eazelo check runs the same public sources in one pass: NPPES identity, the mapped official licensing source for that state and provider type, and CMS practice-location corroboration. Where registry and board records disagree, the result shows the discrepancy instead of quietly picking one.

3Evidence that survives the handoff

Instead of loose screenshots you get a watermarked PDF with source URLs, timestamps, a SHA-256 checksum, and a verification code. A manager or compliance reviewer doesn't have to trust your downloads folder — they paste the code into the public report verifier and confirm the document matches the saved record. See the full anatomy on the sample report page.

4What stays your job

Eazelo is not a state licensing board, and a proof report is not an official license certificate or a credentialing determination. Some sources gate their data or need visual review, so some checks route to manual review rather than pretending. For final credentialing or employment decisions, confirm with the issuing board — the report gives you the exact source link to do it.

Checking a whole roster? Signed-in users can upload a CSV and run every row through the same pipeline — see bulk validation in the portal.

Still stuck? Email support@eazelo.ai and we'll walk you through it.